Category Archives: Gadget Corner

Master category for most electronics.

How HAECO-CSG Kills The Music

“Wrecked,” as one audio engineer calls it.  That is what HAECO-CSG does to music.  What is it, and why was it so bad for recorded music? To understand the process, you have to turn the clock back to the late 60s, when both monaural and sterophonic playback equipment were commonplace in many homes back in the late 1960s.  In some ways, the two were compatible, but in others, they weren’t.  HAECO-CSG attempted to cure that problem.  Little did anyone realize what a sonic mess it made out of recordings.  How could something with good intentions lead to such bad sound?

You have to consider what happens when you play a stereo recording, summed to mono.  The left and right signals stay the same volume, but since music more in the center of the soundstage were present in both channels, they could be as much as three decibels higher than the far left/right signals, which would throw off the balance (the “mix”) of the recording.

Rather than issue two separate versions of a recording as had been done in the past, Howard Holzer, A&M Records’ chief engineer in Los Angeles, created a system that would electrically alter the recording so that when the stereo recording was “folded down” to mono, the balance would be mostly preserved.   HAECO was the Holzer Audio Engineering Company, and CSG was the Compatible Stereo Generator. Mission accomplished?

Not quite.  While a casual and non-critical listener may never hear a difference, the end result is an effect where the stereo soundstage is smeared.  To give an example, let’s use an example of a human, male voice.  Say, Sergio Mendes, on the track “When Summer Turns To Snow” from the Fool On The Hill album, one on which CSG was used to master the album.  A human voice consists of the fundamental frequency (the pitch of the voice…Sergio sings in a baritone), and sibilants (or “formants”), which are like the rasp of the vocal cords, the whistle of air between the teeth, or other high frequency components that are not the main pitch.

Normally in a stereo recording, you can pinpoint the voice by both the formants and the fundamental frequency coming from the exact same spot in the soundstage.  Not so with CSG.  What happens is that the image is smeared.  The formants can be pinpointed, but the fundamental frequency is smeared across the soundstage in a “phasey” sort of way.  The sound also has more of an overly-full presentation to it.  The net effect of CSG with a voice like Sergio’s, and the rest of the music, is almost the same kind of phasey effect you get with the “fake” stereo that was also popular at the time.

The real problem, today, is that many recordings were mixed to two-channel stereo with the CSG processor in the chain, so no two-channel tape exists without the CSG processing.  The only way to properly undo the CSG effect is to remix from the original multitrack master tapes…if they even still existed.  Many CDs have been reissued over the years that contain the CSG processing.  They sound about as good as

There is another fix, and I will outline this in my next installment.  Stay tuned.

Audiogalaxy Music Streaming App

I’ve tried a few different apps for streaming music from my computer to other devices.  The latest is Audiogalaxy.  Once a file sharing peer to peer service, Audiogalaxy now offers what some are incorrectly calling a cloud music service.  What Audiogalaxy does is stream music files from your computer to any remote device, such as my Android phone.  How does it compare to the others?

Continue reading Audiogalaxy Music Streaming App

Grafyx SP-10 loudspeakers…out of mothballs

OK, I admit it–I got tired of the Boston A-150 “Frankenstein” speakers I had bought for just over $30 on eBay several years ago.  They are quite capable, but I felt like I was missing something.  I hauled the A-150s downstairs and brought up my more recent pair of Grafyx SP-10 speakers.  Here’s what I posted over at the Speakeasy regarding these speakers…

Continue reading Grafyx SP-10 loudspeakers…out of mothballs

The Walker CJ-55 Turntable

Back in the early 80s, I took a huge jump in LP sound by upgrading my cartridge to a Shure V15 Type V, which originally had the “HE” (hyper-elliptical) stylus. When the Micro Ridge stylus became available, I replace the HE with it. That cartridge tracked anything I threw at it, even 45s that sounded like crap with my earlier cartridge with its lowly elliptical stylus.

As I had it mounted on an older direct drive turntable, I shopped around quite a bit for a replacement. As a birthday gift one year, I bought myself a Grace G707-II tonearm, which was clearance priced at Absolute Sound. It took me months of looking, but I finally settled on a turntable made by a small UK company called Walker. The model (which may have been their only one at the time) was the CJ-55. The “CJ” were actually the initials of the owner and his wife: Colin and Janet Walker. Colin went on to another audio manufacturer after Walker folded.

I’ve always liked the sound of this turntable–it always had a warm, inviting sound that took away some of the clinical hard edge I noticed in other turntables.  This is due to its construction.  It is based on the same type of design as the Linn Sondek, with a floating subchassis. As you would expect, isolation from room movement is very good. The difference is that the design of the CJ-55 is essentially all wood, or wood by-products. The enclosure and subchassis are fabricated from wood. The plinth is high-density MDF covered in a black vinyl veneer. The platter and subplatter are made of a material called Tufnol, which is very similar to Bakelite…another wood-based product.

One thing that plagued me for years was the speed of the turntable. Not only did it run fast (which, to a person with perfect pitch, will drive that person completely insane…trust me), the speed was not very stable. A new belt from the importer helped things for a brief spell, but it always suffered. As CDs were “the next big thing” in the early 80s, I ended up retiring the Walker for awhile, not playing it very often. Finally by 1995, I got so disgusted with the speed issues that I found a used Denon DP-1000 turntable and mounted the Grace arm and Shure cartridge on it, and have used it for the past 15 years that way.

I was determined to get the Walker back up and running in recent months, and tackle its issues. It was not all smooth going. First of all, checking the motor, the pulley slipped on the shaft, and finally came off. I noticed that they had used an adhesive, so I repaired the pulley with some adhesive I had on hand. In addition, the belt was shot. I stole the belt from the Music Hall MMF-2.1 on hand, which is 1½ inches shorter in length than the Walker’s original 21 inch belt. It is a little too snug, but the torque is there. Being tight, the belt tends to hop around a bit on the motor pulley, so I’m hunting down a slightly larger belt.

How did I solve the speed issue? Surprisingly, using something very low-tech and readily available! I managed to find some wide rubber bands, and put three of them next to each other on the subplatter. I haven’t checked with the strobe yet, but to my ears, it sounds like it is accurate. Stability is pretty much cured, but with a looser belt and an oil change in the bearing, we may have it tweaked as much as possible. A few weeks of listening should reacquaint me with the sound of this setup.

The turntable system is comprised of the Walker CJ-55 turntable, Grace G707-II tonearm, Shure V15V-MR cartridge, and a “tacky” rubber mat called “Music Mat.” (The vinyl clings to the mat when it is clean, dampening vibrations in the vinyl.) For clamping records, I have a plastic “tripod” clamp which grips the spindle. I’d hate to think what this would cost in 2010 dollars, but back then, it probably retailed in total for about $700-$800. The worst part of this whole trip down memory lane is that I originally put this system together 27-28 years ago!

XenForo: The Future of Forum Software

Is Facebook killing forums?  That was an essay topic on the Admin Zone forums.  My opinion is that forums have survived the onslaught of all sorts of “threats” over the years, which turned out to be minor blips on the radar.  As the Facebooks over the years have come and gone, forums have survived.  We’ve survived instant messaging, Twitter, MySpace and other so far.  Forums are more focused, and group members are more single-minded in the topic at hand.  Facebook is more generalized, simpler and more user-friendly in many aspects; we’re comparing apples and oranges.

Forum software itself has grown rather stagnant, however.  phpBB3 was a long-overdue update to phpBB2 that caused many forum owners such as myself to look elsewhere since the software sat undeveloped for about five years.  SMF’s latest version looked promising but there, the development staff has splintered and development has ceased, despite what they are claiming publicly.  vBulletin had a major update with the release of 4.0, but many forum administrators (present company included) found it to be a bit nicer looking, but also a bit slower and rather devoid of any really new thinking in the area of forum software.  How did such a major and influential product lose its way?

Continue reading XenForo: The Future of Forum Software